A phytools user contacted me the other day about an issue in which
her bootstrap values, stored as node labels in a Newick string, did not
align with the correct edges when plotted using
edgelabels.cophylo
on a visualized "cophylo"
object.
As it turns out, this had nothing to do with cophylo
& everything to do with the fact that she wanted to plot node labels
using edgelabels
.
First, here is a demo showing that cophylo
preserves
the correct order of node labels.
A simulated tree with node labels:
library(phytools)
tree<-pbtree(n=26,tip.label=LETTERS)
tree$node.label<-letters[1:25]
Now I'll plot that tree labeling the nodes with their labels & node indices:
plotTree(tree)
nodelabels(tree$node.label,1:tree$Nnode+Ntip(tree))
nodelabels(adj=c(1.8,-1.8),frame="none",cex=0.5)
Next, I'm going to randomly rotate nodes on this tree to produce two new trees as follows:
t1<-tree
for(i in 1:100) t1<-untangle(rotate(t1,sample(1:t1$Nnode+Ntip(t1),1)),
'read.tree')
t2<-tree
for(i in 1:100) t2<-untangle(rotate(t2,sample(1:t2$Nnode+Ntip(t2),1)),
'read.tree')
Now I'm ready to make my "cophylo"
object. First, without
node rotation to maximize matching:
obj<-cophylo(t1,t2,rotate=FALSE)
plot(obj)
nodelabels.cophylo(obj$trees[[1]]$node.label,1:obj$trees[[1]]$Nnode+
Ntip(obj$trees[[1]]))
nodelabels.cophylo(adj=c(1.8,-1.8),frame="none",cex=0.5)
nodelabels.cophylo(obj$trees[[2]]$node.label,1:obj$trees[[2]]$Nnode+
Ntip(obj$trees[[2]]),which="right")
nodelabels.cophylo(adj=c(-0.8,-1.8),frame="none",cex=0.5,which="right")
We can see that the node indices (the little numbers that come from
tree$edge
have changed, but the node labels are still all
associated with the right clades.
Now we can do the same thing, but in which we permit node rotation to be optimized as follows:
obj<-cophylo(t1,t2,rotate=TRUE)
## Rotating nodes to optimize matching...
## Done.
plot(obj)
nodelabels.cophylo(obj$trees[[1]]$node.label,1:obj$trees[[1]]$Nnode+
Ntip(obj$trees[[1]]))
nodelabels.cophylo(adj=c(1.8,-1.8),frame="none",cex=0.5)
nodelabels.cophylo(obj$trees[[2]]$node.label,1:obj$trees[[2]]$Nnode+
Ntip(obj$trees[[2]]),which="right")
nodelabels.cophylo(adj=c(-0.8,-1.8),frame="none",cex=0.5,which="right")
So what was the problem with the edge labels in the user's inquiry? Well,
basically, edgelabels
(and edgelabels.cophylo
,
which just uses edgelabels
internally) takes the labels
in the order of the rows of tree$edge
in the plotted phylogeny
- not in the number order of the node indices, as in
nodelabels
andtree$node.label
. Thus, we have to match the two in order to visualize our node labels along each preceding edge. This might be done as follows:
obj<-cophylo(t1,t2,rotate=TRUE)
## Rotating nodes to optimize matching...
## Done.
plot(obj)
edgelabels.cophylo(obj$trees[[1]]$node.label[2:obj$trees[[1]]$Nnode],
edge=sapply(2:obj$trees[[1]]$Nnode+Ntip(obj$trees[[1]]),
function(n,e) which(e==n),e=obj$trees[[1]]$edge[,2]),
frame="none",adj=c(0.5,1))
edgelabels.cophylo(obj$trees[[2]]$node.label[2:obj$trees[[2]]$Nnode],
edge=sapply(2:obj$trees[[2]]$Nnode+Ntip(obj$trees[[2]]),
function(n,e) which(e==n),e=obj$trees[[2]]$edge[,2]),
frame="none",adj=c(0.5,1),which="right")
Neat.
Hello Liam,
ReplyDeleteThank you for putting up this blog, it is very informative personally to me who is graduate student in bioinformatics who's just learning how to use R for phylogenetic studies.
My major challenge here is knowing when, where and how to use these functions (for example nodelabels, edgelabels, Nnode, untagle, and many more). Do you have any tips that you can share on how to use them appropriately and not mixing them up.
Cheers,
ID.
Buy hublot fake watch, best breitling replica, breitling replica rolex watches , breitling replikas, u-boat italo fontana, replica cartier, hublot replica watches, fake watches breitling, replica montblanc, come here buy replica watches uk, rolex watches fake, watch replica breitling, replica tag heuer watches, omega watch copy, cheapest fake rolex, omega.
ReplyDeleteHi Liam,
ReplyDeleteWhen using cophylo with two rooted trees with node labels (bootstrap values), at least some of the node labels are at the wrong nodes in the output trees in the cophylo object. In the input trees tree$node.label[1]="Root" and tree$node.label[2]="", as they should be. After cophylo I extract the trees from the cophylo object. In these trees tree$node.label[1]= is still "Root", but tree$node.label[2]="100", and tree$node.label[79]="". Node 79 is nowhere near the root and clearly shouldn't be empty. When I compare other node labels with the input trees many do not match. This does not happen when I use cophylo with unrooted trees, but since I need my trees to be rooted, this is not an option. I have tried rooting both with the root and reroot functions, but the problem persists, and have also tried rerooting after cophylo, but this doesn't give the desired result. So is it possible to run cophylo with rooted trees, without scrambling the node labels, or is this function only meant to be run with unrooted trees?
Cheers,
ME
I have found that cophylo does mix the node labels up, even with rotate=FALSE. Your example does not get mixed up because you are re-assigning the labels from the tip names after you have made the cophylo object. I have raised the issue on GitHub, I hope there is a solution. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteHowever - just tested the method using edgelabels and that works great! So I will use that, Thanks.
ReplyDelete