A colleague recently asked me the following question titled:

**“Simulating trees with different pybus & Harvey's γ.”**

*“This may be a question with a very obvious answer, but is there a way of
simulating Yule trees so they are either early burst or late burst (i.e. can
you create simulated trees with a high or low γ)? Trying to satisfy a
reviewerâ€™s request to test our taxonomy paper against null models.”*

Well, we can't precisely simulate constant-rate pure-birth trees that have a
particular γ value; however, one thing we could do is *transform*
the edge lengths of the tree so that has a particular, predictable value of
γ. In fact, it turns out to be the case - at least so far as I can
tell (though I don't have a formal proof of this) that for any tree &
particular value of γ, there is a corresponding “EB” (early-burst or
ACDC, see Blomberg et al.
2003)
edge-length transformation that will produce that very-same γ. It's
just a matter of finding it!

Turns out - that's pretty easy. We can use numerical optimization, and since
we only need to optimize in one-dimension, as the EB transformation only has
one paramter, *r*, optimization is both fast & robust.

For instance:

```
library(phytools)
## simulate a tree
tree<-pbtree(n=100)
ltt(tree,show.tree=TRUE,log.lineages=F,log="y")
```

```
## Object of class "ltt" containing:
##
## (1) A phylogenetic tree with 100 tips and 99 internal nodes.
##
## (2) Vectors containing the number of lineages (ltt) and branching times (times) on the tree.
##
## (3) A value for Pybus & Harvey's "gamma" statistic of 2.0956, p-value = 0.0361.
```

```
## transform to gamma=0
ebTree<-phytools:::ebTree
gamma<-function(r,tree,g)
(g-ltt(ebTree(tree,r),plot=FALSE)$gamma)^2
fit<-optimize(gamma,c(-10,10),tree=tree,g=0,tol=1e-12)
ltt(ebTree(tree,fit$minimum),show.tree=TRUE,log.lineages=F,log="y",
lwd=2)
```

```
## Object of class "ltt" containing:
##
## (1) A phylogenetic tree with 100 tips and 99 internal nodes.
##
## (2) Vectors containing the number of lineages (ltt) and branching times (times) on the tree.
##
## (3) A value for Pybus & Harvey's "gamma" statistic of 0, p-value = 1.
```

```
## or how about gamma=10
fit<-optimize(gamma,c(-10,10),tree=tree,g=10,tol=1e-12)
ltt(ebTree(tree,fit$minimum),show.tree=TRUE,log.lineages=F,log="y",
lwd=2)
```

```
## Object of class "ltt" containing:
##
## (1) A phylogenetic tree with 100 tips and 99 internal nodes.
##
## (2) Vectors containing the number of lineages (ltt) and branching times (times) on the tree.
##
## (3) A value for Pybus & Harvey's "gamma" statistic of 10, p-value = 0.
```

```
## or gamma=-10
fit<-optimize(gamma,c(-10,10),tree=tree,g=-10,tol=1e-12)
ltt(ebTree(tree,fit$minimum),show.tree=TRUE,log.lineages=F,log="y",
lwd=2)
```

```
## Object of class "ltt" containing:
##
## (1) A phylogenetic tree with 100 tips and 99 internal nodes.
##
## (2) Vectors containing the number of lineages (ltt) and branching times (times) on the tree.
##
## (3) A value for Pybus & Harvey's "gamma" statistic of -10, p-value = 0.
```

Note that the `ebTree`

transformation, though it does
produce the correct γ, has the side-effect of changing the total
depth of the tree. This needn't be the case. For instance, we can just
do the following:

```
## custom EB function to hold total length constant
EB<-function(tree,r){
d<-max(nodeHeights(tree))
tree<-ebTree(tree,r)
tree$edge.length<-tree$edge.length/max(nodeHeights(tree))*d
tree
}
gamma<-function(r,tree,g)
(g-ltt(EB(tree,r),plot=FALSE)$gamma)^2
## try with gamma=-4
fit<-optimize(gamma,c(-10,10),tree=tree,g=-4,tol=1e-12)
ltt(EB(tree,fit$minimum),show.tree=TRUE,log.lineages=F,log="y",
lwd=2)
```

```
## Object of class "ltt" containing:
##
## (1) A phylogenetic tree with 100 tips and 99 internal nodes.
##
## (2) Vectors containing the number of lineages (ltt) and branching times (times) on the tree.
##
## (3) A value for Pybus & Harvey's "gamma" statistic of -4, p-value = 1e-04.
```

OK, now let's generate 100 trees with total length of 1.0 and γ=-1:

```
trees<-pbtree(n=100,scale=1,nsim=100)
foo<-function(tree,g)
optimize(gamma,c(-10,10),tree=tree,g=g,tol=1e-12)$minimum
r<-sapply(trees,foo,g=-1)
ttrees<-mapply(EB,tree=trees,r=r,SIMPLIFY=FALSE)
class(ttrees)<-"multiPhylo"
g<-sapply(ttrees,function(x) ltt(x,plot=FALSE)$gamma)
g
```

```
## [1] -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
## [24] -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
## [47] -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
## [70] -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
## [93] -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
```

```
ltt(ttrees,col=make.transparent("blue",0.25))
```

```
## 100 objects of class "ltt" in a list
```

What's neat is that for our single fixed value of γ = -1.0, the LTT curves vary quite a lot!

[Note. In the original post I called `ltt(trees,...)`

rather
than `ltt(ttrees,...)`

- that is, `ltt`

on the
original, rather than transformed trees. Shown above this is fixed, but
the LTT plots still vary quite a bit.]

That's it. Hopefully of some help.

The BestRay-Ban UK. Here you can find almost swiss brand replica watches.Replica watches,one of the most famous brands,Best active-sunglasses/ ,Specialities watch for sale,Fast delivery and free shipping!

ReplyDelete