^{2}=1.0 has the exact same meaning & interpretation of thresholds [0,2,6] and σ

^{2}=2.0.

Nonetheless, since I have simulated liability evolution with a fixed, known σ

^{2}(and it is the same σ

^{2}that I will use for estimation), it makes sense

*in this rare case*to look at the posterior density for the thresholds on its raw scale. I decided to simulate using a four state (thus 3 threshold) model, in which the four states are "blue", "green", "red", and "yellow"; and the threshold transition points between colors are 0 (

*blue*to

*green*), 1 (

*green*to

*red*) and 4 (

*red*to

*yellow*).

Here was my simulation:

> # load source

> source("ancThresh.R")

> # simulate tree

> tree<-pbtree(n=100,scale=10)

> # simulate liability

> l<-fastBM(tree,internal=TRUE,a=2)

> # translate to discrete character

> x<-rep("blue",length(l))

> x[l>0]<-"green"

> x[l>1]<-"red"

> x[l>4]<-"yellow"

> names(x)<-names(l)

> sequence<-c("blue","green","red","yellow")

> cols<-sequence; names(cols)<-sequence

> res<-ancThresh(tree,x[1:length(tree$tip)],seq=sequence, ngen=1000000,control=list(piecol=cols))

MCMC starting....

gen 1000

gen 2000

...

> source("ancThresh.R")

> # simulate tree

> tree<-pbtree(n=100,scale=10)

> # simulate liability

> l<-fastBM(tree,internal=TRUE,a=2)

> # translate to discrete character

> x<-rep("blue",length(l))

> x[l>0]<-"green"

> x[l>1]<-"red"

> x[l>4]<-"yellow"

> names(x)<-names(l)

> sequence<-c("blue","green","red","yellow")

> cols<-sequence; names(cols)<-sequence

> res<-ancThresh(tree,x[1:length(tree$tip)],seq=sequence, ngen=1000000,control=list(piecol=cols))

MCMC starting....

gen 1000

gen 2000

...

The posterior sample for the thresholds is in res$par. Unlike in the translation, above, each threshold is named for its upper bound (so,

*blue*= 0;

*green*= 1;

*red*= 4; and

*yellow*= Inf, in this case). Obviously, and again because liabilities are unscaled and uncentered, we fix the lowest of these at a constant value - we choose 0, but this is arbitrary.

Now let's do some computations to plot the posterior density:

> breaks<--0.25:25/5

> breaks

[1] -0.05 0.15 0.35 0.55 0.75 0.95 ...

> green<-hist(res$par[,"green"],breaks=breaks)

> red<-hist(res$par[,"red"],breaks=breaks)

> plot(red$mids,red$density,type="s",ylim=c(0, max(c(red$density,green$density))),xlab="liability", ylab="density",col="red")

> lines(red$mids,green$density,type="s",col="green")

> breaks

[1] -0.05 0.15 0.35 0.55 0.75 0.95 ...

> green<-hist(res$par[,"green"],breaks=breaks)

> red<-hist(res$par[,"red"],breaks=breaks)

> plot(red$mids,red$density,type="s",ylim=c(0, max(c(red$density,green$density))),xlab="liability", ylab="density",col="red")

> lines(red$mids,green$density,type="s",col="green")

I have also added the generating threshold (colored on each side with the appropriate discrete state) for fun. Not too bad. It should also be noted that if we look at the ratio of the mean estimates of the two thresholds this is also quite close to the generating ratio of four:

> mean(res$par[,"red"])/mean(res$par[,"green"])

[1] 4.3913

[1] 4.3913

That's it.

## No comments:

## Post a Comment

Note: due to the very large amount of spam, all comments are now automatically submitted for moderation.